How we compared these services

This comparison is published by Delist.ai. We include ourselves honestly and disclose where competitors lead. Every factual claim about a competitor links to a primary source — the vendor's own site, Consumer Reports, KrebsOnSecurity, or the Deloitte audit — with an "as of" date. We do not use affiliate links.

We evaluated each service on six criteria:

  1. Independent effectiveness data — has the service been tested by a credible third party? The Consumer Reports "Data Defense" study (August 8, 2024) is the backbone. It recruited 32 volunteers via digital-safety org Tall Poppy, tested across 13 people-search sites with 4 participants per service, and measured removal rates at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months.
  2. Verification method — does the service confirm removals actually happened, or just report requests sent?
  3. Coverage honesty — how do marketing claims compare to independently verifiable broker counts?
  4. Re-monitoring frequency — how often does it check for re-listings?
  5. Price — effective annual cost for an individual.
  6. Trust and transparency — any controversies, conflicts of interest, or audit data.
Important context: Consumer Reports found that manual opt-outs achieved a 70% removal rate in the same test. Even the best service (Optery, 68%) did not outperform doing it yourself. The value proposition of a service is not effectiveness — it is the hours of ongoing work you do not have to do. Brokers relist within 30-90 days; removal is a continuous process, not a one-time task.

The services, ranked

Ordered by the weight of independent evidence, then by price-to-coverage ratio. Services without independent effectiveness data are grouped at the end.

1. Optery

Price: $48/yr (Core) – $249/yr (Ultimate) Coverage: 145–955+ (tiered by plan) CR result: 68% (4 months) — #1 tested

Optery is the only consumer removal service that provides screenshot before/after proof of every removal. It ranked first in the Consumer Reports test at 68% of listings removed within four months (52% at 1 week, 58% at 1 month). PCMag Editors' Choice four years running.

The catch: coverage is paywalled by tier. The $48/year Core plan covers approximately 145-380 brokers; to reach 600+ you need Ultimate at $249/year. The "Expanded Reach" toggle inflates counts further. Still, if verified removal with evidence is your priority, Optery is the service to beat.

Strengths
Screenshot proof of removals
Best independent test result (68%)
Free Basic tier with quarterly exposure reports
Transparent reporting
Weaknesses
Coverage paywalled by tier
Ultimate tier expensive ($249/yr)
Email-only support
Primarily US-focused
Best for: People who want visual proof that their data was actually removed and are willing to pay for the strongest independently-tested service.

2. EasyOptOuts

Price: $19.99/yr (flat) Coverage: 200+ people-search sites CR result: 65% (4 months) — #2 tested, cheapest

EasyOptOuts is the value champion. At $19.99 per year — less than two dollars a month — it delivered the second-best independent removal rate (65%, only 3 percentage points behind Optery) in the Consumer Reports test. It also earned favorable marks from Privacy Guides.

The trade-off is minimalism. No dashboard, no screenshots, no family plan. You get an email summary after each scan cycle, which runs every 4 months. The company deliberately limits its broker list to sites it can actually scan and remove from, refusing to inflate counts with blind mass-emails. A principled approach, but the 4-month gap between scans means re-listings go undetected for long stretches.

Strengths
Lowest price in category ($19.99/yr)
Second-best CR result (65%)
Minimal data collection, strong ethics
Honest coverage claims
Weaknesses
4-month scan cycle leaves re-listing gaps
No dashboard or screenshot proof
No family plan
US-only, people-search only
Best for: Budget-conscious buyers who want proven, no-frills removal at the industry's lowest price.

3. Delist.ai

Price: Free scan; paid removal plans available Coverage: People-search + marketing/B2B brokers CR result: Not tested (launched after study)

Disclosure: this is our service. We include ourselves honestly. We were not part of the Consumer Reports study (we launched after it concluded) and do not have independent effectiveness data to cite.

What we do differently: we verify every removal by re-scanning after opt-out submission — a removal is not marked complete until the profile is confirmed gone. We cover people-search brokers and extend into marketing, B2B, and AI-training data services — a scope most competitors do not address. Our free scan shows your exposure before you pay anything.

Where we are still building: our broker count is smaller than the largest competitors, and we have not yet been independently audited. We are transparent about which brokers require manual intervention due to CAPTCHAs or phone verification.

Strengths
Verified removals with re-scan confirmation
Broader scope (people-search + marketing/B2B + AI)
Free scan before payment
Transparent about limitations
Weaknesses
No independent effectiveness test yet
Smaller broker list than largest competitors
Newer entrant (less track record)
US-focused
Best for: People who want verified removals across a broader range of data sources (beyond people-search alone) and value transparency from a newer service.

4. DeleteMe

Price: $129/yr (individual) Coverage: Markets "750-850+" (approximately 85 automated) CR result: 27% (4 months)

DeleteMe (Abine, Inc.) is the oldest data removal service, operating since 2010-2011. It uses human "Privacy Advisors" to submit opt-outs on your behalf, with quarterly reports showing per-broker status. US-based phone/chat/email support.

Two things to note. First, the broker-count marketing: DeleteMe advertises "750-850+" sites, but independent analysis shows approximately 85-86 are covered by automated removal (Standard tier), with the rest requiring capped "custom removal requests" (40 on Standard, 60 on Premium). Second, in the Consumer Reports test, DeleteMe removed only 27% of listings in four months — well below manual opt-outs (70%) and significantly behind Optery (68%) and EasyOptOuts (65%).

Strengths
Longest track record (since 2010-2011)
Human-assisted removals with detailed reports
Responsive US-based support
International coverage (UK, Canada, Australia)
Weaknesses
27% removal rate in CR test (below manual)
Marketing claims vs ~85 automated sites
Premium pricing ($129+/yr)
Quarterly scan gaps allow re-listing
Best for: Buyers who prioritize human oversight, detailed reports, and a long brand track record — and who value support over raw removal rate.

Check your exposure before choosing a service. Delist.ai scans the web for your personal data and shows exactly where you appear.

Run a free scan

5. Incogni

Price: $95.88/yr (Standard annual) Coverage: 420+ brokers (Deloitte-verified) CR result: Not tested

Incogni (owned by Surfshark / Nord Security) is the strongest budget option for automated, set-and-forget removal. Its "420+" broker count is the only independently verified figure in the industry: Deloitte Lietuva UAB issued an ISAE 3000 assurance report (August 2025) confirming coverage of "at least 420 data-broker websites" and verifying resubmission cycles of 60 days (public brokers) and 90 days (private brokers).

The gap: Incogni was not included in the Consumer Reports effectiveness study, so its actual removal rate is unknown. The Deloitte audit verified process and claims, not outcomes. Dashboard status counts are the only visibility into removal progress — no screenshot proof. The Unlimited tier (~$249/yr) adds human-assisted custom removals across 2,000-3,000+ additional sites.

Strengths
Only Deloitte-verified broker count
Lowest price for breadth ($96/yr)
Best family value (up to 5 people)
GDPR/CCPA international reach (US, EU, UK, CA)
Weaknesses
No independent removal-rate test
No screenshot proof
Monthly billing doubles the price
Ticket-based support only
Best for: Set-and-forget buyers, families, international users, and Surfshark bundle owners who want audited coverage at a reasonable price.

6. Kanary

Price: $9.99/mo (Copilot Premium); legacy Cloud ~$180/yr Coverage: 300+ sites CR result: 34% (4 months)

Kanary stands out for continuous real-time monitoring with push alerts when new listings appear. It is now mobile-first via the Kanary Copilot app (iOS only; Android waitlisted). The company claims over 90% of people-search removals complete within 14 days.

The unusual model: Kanary pushes some manual steps onto the user. You handle CAPTCHAs, confirmation emails, and task completion — roughly 10 minutes per week. In the Consumer Reports test, Kanary removed 34% of listings in four months, a mid-level result. The iOS-only mobile requirement and higher per-broker cost limit its appeal.

Strengths
Real-time monitoring and alerts
Transparency and user control
Free tier available
Strong people-search focus
Weaknesses
Requires user manual input (CAPTCHAs, emails)
iOS-only app (Android waitlisted)
34% CR result (mid-level)
Weak marketing/B2B coverage
Best for: Apple/mobile-first users who want visibility and are willing to do some hands-on work as part of their privacy routine.

7. Aura

Price: $144/yr (individual) – $384/yr (family) Coverage: 200+ sites (in broader identity suite) CR result: Not tested

Aura is an all-in-one identity protection suite: 3-bureau credit monitoring, VPN, antivirus, password manager, dark-web monitoring, up to $5 million identity-theft insurance, and data removal. 24/7 US-based support.

The data removal component is notably weaker than dedicated services. No custom removals, no screenshot proof, and no independent effectiveness testing. Critical reviews report it misses some major people-search sites (Spokeo, BeenVerified, Intelius). Broker counts are inconsistent across Aura's own marketing pages (200+ on some, ~140 on others, ~39 cited historically). If your primary need is data removal, a specialist service will outperform Aura's bundled offering.

Strengths
All-in-one suite (credit, VPN, insurance)
Fast fraud alerts and dark-web monitoring
24/7 US support
Family and kids coverage
Weaknesses
Shallow data removal vs specialists
No independent removal-rate test
No screenshot proof or custom removals
Inconsistent broker-count marketing
Best for: Buyers who want a single identity-protection dashboard covering credit, devices, and removal — and accept that removal will not be best-in-class.

8. OneRep

Price: ~$100/yr (individual annual) Coverage: 195–235 people-search sites CR result: Not tested

OneRep is fully automated with a "True Scan" feature that checks each broker's database before submitting an opt-out and re-checks to confirm removal. Clean dashboard, family plans covering up to 6 people.

Trust caveat: In March 2024, KrebsOnSecurity reported that OneRep CEO Dimitri Shelest founded dozens of people-search sites and retains an ownership stake in data broker Nuwber. Shelest acknowledged the Nuwber stake but said there was "zero cross-over or information-sharing with OneRep." Mozilla ended its OneRep-powered Monitor Plus partnership over the conflict, shutting down the paid removal tier on December 17, 2025. OneRep has no independent effectiveness test — the company claims approximately 90% success.

Strengths
Clean UI and ease of use
True Scan verification
Family up to 6
No POA/forms required
Weaknesses
CEO conflict-of-interest (Krebs, 2024)
Mozilla dropped partnership
No independent effectiveness test
US-only, no dark-web features
Best for: US users who want simple automated removal and who weigh the trust question for themselves.

9. Privacy Bee

Price: $96/yr (Essentials) – $799/yr (Signature) Coverage: Markets "1,000+" (~500 on real dashboards) CR result: Not tested

Privacy Bee claims the broadest scope in the market, targeting people-search sites, marketing data brokers, B2B databases, and dark-web monitoring. Weekly dashboard audits are more frequent than most competitors' quarterly or monthly scans.

The gap between marketing and reality is notable. Privacy Bee advertises "1,000+" brokers (some pages cite 885, others 1,033 or 1,100+), but independent reviewer dashboards consistently show approximately 500-588 sites actually listed. The Essentials tier ($96/yr) covers only people-search; meaningful marketing/B2B coverage requires Pro at $197/year. No independent effectiveness test has been published. Trustpilot reviews are mixed (~3.4/5) with complaints about pricing transparency and difficulty deleting accounts.

Strengths
Broadest claimed scope (marketing/B2B)
Weekly audits (more frequent than most)
Privacy tools bundle (browser extension, search)
Enterprise/business offering
Weaknesses
Marketing claims vs ~500 dashboard reality
Not independently tested
Real coverage requires $197+/yr
Mixed reviews (Trustpilot 3.4/5)
Best for: Privacy maximalists and enterprises who want the widest scope and are willing to pay the premium — with the understanding that effectiveness is unverified.

10. ReputationDefender

Price: Custom (historically premium, $100+/mo range) Coverage: Varies by plan CR result: 6% (4 months)

ReputationDefender (now owned by Gen Digital / NortonLifeLock) focuses on broader online reputation management rather than pure data-broker removal. Services include search-result suppression, review management, and privacy monitoring.

In the Consumer Reports test, ReputationDefender removed only 6% of listings within four months — the second-worst result among the seven tested services, far below even the mid-level performers. At premium pricing, this is difficult to justify for data-broker removal specifically. The service may be more relevant for broader reputation management needs that extend beyond broker opt-outs.

Strengths
Broader reputation management scope
Backed by Gen Digital (Norton parent)
Enterprise and professional tiers
Weaknesses
6% CR removal rate (near-worst tested)
Premium pricing
Not primarily a removal service
Opaque coverage details
Best for: People who need broader reputation management (search suppression, review management) rather than data-broker removal specifically.

Full comparison table

Service Annual price Broker count CR removal rate Verification Re-check cycle International
Optery $48 – $249 145–955+ (tiered) 68% (#1) Screenshot proof Monthly Mostly US
EasyOptOuts $19.99 200+ 65% (#2) Re-scan only Every 4 months US only
Delist.ai Plans available People-search + marketing/B2B Not tested Re-scan verified Ongoing US
DeleteMe $129 – $329 "750-850+" (~85 automated) 27% Reports (no screenshots) Quarterly US + intl
Incogni $96 – $249 420+ (Deloitte-verified) Not tested Dashboard only 60/90-day resubmit US, EU, UK, CA
Kanary $120 – $180 300+ 34% User-marked Real-time alerts Mostly US
Aura $144 – $384 200+ (inconsistent) Not tested Dashboard only Continuous US
OneRep ~$100 195–235 Not tested True Scan re-check Continuous US only
Privacy Bee $96 – $799 "1,000+" (~500 real) Not tested Dashboard + follow-ups Weekly audits Global (US-weighted)
ReputationDefender Custom (premium) Varies 6% Not specified Varies US

All pricing as of Q1 2026. Broker counts are company-claimed unless noted. "CR removal rate" = Consumer Reports Data Defense study, August 8, 2024, at the 4-month mark. "Not tested" means the service was not included in the CR study.

Methodology and sources

The Consumer Reports "Data Defense" study (published August 8, 2024) is the only rigorous independent field test of consumer data removal services. The methodology: 32 volunteers recruited through Tall Poppy (a digital-safety organization), 13 people-search sites monitored, 4 participants per service, removal rates measured at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months. A manual opt-out control group achieved 70%.

The study has acknowledged limitations: a small sample size (4 users per service), only 13 of the hundreds of broker sites tested, and data from May-September 2023. Services may have improved since. Optery publicly disputed the study's framing, arguing it should be credited as the clear #1 rather than presented as roughly tied with EasyOptOuts.

Beyond Consumer Reports, we drew on:

  • KrebsOnSecurity (Brian Krebs) — investigative reporting on OneRep's CEO and data-broker conflicts of interest (March 14, 2024)
  • Deloitte Lietuva UAB — ISAE 3000 limited assurance report on Incogni (issued August 13, 2025, data as of July 18, 2025)
  • Privacy Guides — independent, community-driven privacy recommendations (tested EasyOptOuts favorably)
  • Each service's own pricing page, coverage claims, and published methodology (verified with "as of" dates)
  • Review aggregators: Trustpilot, PCMag, Security.org, AllAboutCookies, CyberInsider
What about California DROP? California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) went live January 1, 2026. It lets California residents submit a single free deletion request covering all registered data brokers (approximately 500-545 as of early 2026). Brokers must process requests within 45 days starting August 1, 2026. DROP is valuable but limited: it only covers California-registered brokers and only California residents. A paid service adds re-monitoring, re-filing on re-listings, and coverage of brokers that are not California-registered.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best data removal service?

It depends on what you prioritize. In the only rigorous independent test (Consumer Reports, August 2024), Optery ranked first at 68% of listings removed within four months and EasyOptOuts was a close second at 65% — while costing just $19.99 per year. For budget buyers, EasyOptOuts offers proven value. For screenshot proof of every removal, Optery leads. For set-and-forget international coverage, Incogni is strong. Delist combines verified removals with coverage across people-search, marketing, and AI-training brokers. No single service is best on every axis.

Are data removal services worth it?

For most people with significant exposure, yes. Consumer Reports found that even the best services removed only 65-68% of listings in four months — but manual opt-outs only managed 70%, and those require hours of sustained personal effort. The real value of a service is persistence: brokers relist profiles within 30-90 days, so removal is not a one-time task. If your data appears on more than a handful of sites and you do not have hours per month to maintain manual opt-outs, the trade-off favors a service. If you have 2-3 listings, manual removal is perfectly practical.

What did Consumer Reports find about data removal services?

Consumer Reports published its "Data Defense" study on August 8, 2024 — the only rigorous independent field test. They recruited 32 volunteers through Tall Poppy, tested 7 services across 13 people-search sites, and measured removal rates at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 months. Results at 4 months: Optery 68%, EasyOptOuts 65%, IDX 40%, Kanary 34%, DeleteMe 27%, ReputationDefender 6%, Confidently 4%. Manual opt-outs achieved 70%. The study has limitations (small sample, limited broker set), but it remains the most credible independent benchmark.

See where your personal data is exposed

Run a free scan to find your data across people-search sites, marketing brokers, and more. No credit card required.

Run a free scan →

Sources

  1. Consumer Reports, "Who Is Protecting Your Data from Data Brokers?" (Data Defense study), August 8, 2024 — consumerreports.org
  2. KrebsOnSecurity, "CEO of Data Privacy Company Onerep.com Founded Dozens of People-Search Firms," March 14, 2024 — krebsonsecurity.com
  3. Deloitte Lietuva UAB, Independent Limited Assurance Report on Incogni (ISAE 3000), issued August 13, 2025 — referenced at incogni.com
  4. Privacy Guides, EasyOptOuts review — privacyguides.org
  5. Mozilla, Monitor Plus wind-down advisory, November 18, 2025 — support.mozilla.org
  6. California Privacy Protection Agency, Data Broker Registry — cppa.ca.gov
  7. Security.org, DeleteMe review — security.org
  8. PCMag, Optery review (Editors' Choice) — pcmag.com
  9. AllAboutCookies, removal service comparisons — allaboutcookies.org
  10. CyberInsider / Cybernews, removal service reviews — cyberinsider.com, cybernews.com